Key Stage 3 geography · Human geography
KS3 international development: a guide for parents
In Key Stage 3, students study why some countries have a much higher standard of living than others, and how that is measured. They learn the main indicators of development, how to compare countries using data, why the gaps exist and what is done to reduce them. It is a topic that rewards careful reading of numbers as much as knowing facts, and it prepares students for the human geography they meet in GCSE.
International development, explained
Development means an improvement in people’s standard of living and quality of life. In class, students quickly learn that this is not the same as being rich. A country can have a high average income and still have large numbers of people without decent housing, or a modest income and good schools and healthcare. That is why geographers use a range of indicators rather than a single figure.
The indicators fall into three groups. Economic indicators include gross national income per person, which is the total income of a country’s people divided by its population. Social indicators include life expectancy, infant mortality (babies who die before their first birthday, per 1,000 born), adult literacy and the share of people with clean water. Composite indicators combine several measures into one. The best known is the Human Development Index, which combines life expectancy (health), years of schooling (education) and income per person into a score between 0 and 1. Students learn the strengths of each and, just as importantly, the weaknesses.
The biggest weakness is that these are averages. A country with a high average income may hide a few very rich people and many poor ones, and a national figure says nothing about differences between cities and villages, or between men and women. Students are taught to ask what a number leaves out, what year it comes from and who collected it. This is the “analysing and interpreting different data sources” skill in the National Curriculum, and it is as much a skill in maths as in geography.
Having measured the gap, students ask why it exists. Typical causes include physical factors (a landlocked position, drought, tropical diseases, earthquakes and cyclones), historical ones (colonial rule, conflict, the way borders were drawn), economic ones (dependence on selling raw materials, whose prices swing, rather than manufactured goods) and political ones (instability and corruption). Students then weigh up ways of reducing the gap, such as aid, fair trade, investment by companies, debt relief and small-scale “appropriate technology”, and judge which work best and for whom.
The National Curriculum asks for detailed place-based examples at different scales. Schools choose their own: perhaps a low-income country such as Malawi or Sierra Leone, a rapidly growing economy such as Vietnam or Nigeria, and the UK for comparison. Ask your teenager which places they have studied. You may hear terms like high-income, middle-income and low-income countries; many schools now avoid the labels “developed” and “developing” because they suggest a fixed ladder that every country climbs in the same way.
Words your child will hear
- Development
- Improvement in people’s standard of living and quality of life, including health, education and income.
- Indicator
- A piece of data used to measure something, such as life expectancy or literacy rate.
- Gross national income (GNI) per person
- A country’s total income divided by its population, a measure of average income.
- Human Development Index
- A score from 0 to 1 combining life expectancy, schooling and income, so that countries can be compared and ranked.
- Infant mortality
- The number of babies per 1,000 born alive who die before their first birthday.
- Development gap
- The difference in standard of living between richer and poorer countries.
- Aid
- Help given to a country, as money, goods, expertise or emergency supplies, by governments, charities or individuals.
What the National Curriculum says
The programme of study for Key Stage 3 says:
- Pupils should be taught to understand, through the use of detailed place-based exemplars at a variety of scales, the key processes in physical and human geography
- Human geography relating to: population and urbanisation; international development; economic activity in the primary, secondary, tertiary and quaternary sectors; and the use of natural resources
- Pupils should develop greater competence in using geographical knowledge, approaches and concepts [such as models and theories] and geographical skills in analysing and interpreting different data sources.
Objectives from the National Curriculum in England, © Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
A model answer: comparing two countries
Here are invented figures for two countries. Country A: GNI per person $48,000, life expectancy 82 years, infant mortality 3 per 1,000 births. Country B: GNI per person $2,100, life expectancy 64 years, infant mortality 52 per 1,000 births. Compare their levels of development and say how far you trust the data.
- Start by saying what each indicator measures and what a higher or lower value means. A higher income and life expectancy suggest a higher standard of living, but a higher infant mortality figure suggests poorer healthcare, nutrition or sanitation, so the scale runs the other way.
- Make the gap precise with a calculation. Income: 48,000 ÷ 2,100 is about 23, so the average person in Country A earns roughly 23 times as much as in Country B. Life expectancy: 82 − 64 = 18 years longer. Infant mortality: 52 ÷ 3 is about 17, so a baby in Country B is roughly 17 times more likely to die in its first year.
48,000 ÷ 2,100 = 22.9... 82 − 64 = 18 52 ÷ 3 = 17.3...
- Look for a link between the indicators rather than listing them one by one. Lower income often means fewer clinics, less clean water and fewer trained staff, which helps explain both the shorter lives and the higher infant deaths.
- Say what the data cannot show. These are national averages, so they hide differences between rich and poor, town and countryside. Three indicators are also a narrow picture: literacy, school attendance for girls and access to clean water would add more, and so would the trend over several years, because Country B might be improving quickly.
Country A is much more developed on all three indicators: about 23 times the income per person, 18 more years of life and a baby death rate about 17 times lower. The indicators are linked, so the gaps probably reinforce each other. However, averages hide inequality and three measures over one year cannot show whether Country B is catching up, so more data would be needed before judging how quickly the gap is closing.
Common mistakes and how to help
Thinking development simply means being rich
Income is the figure most often quoted in the news, so it feels like the whole story. In fact two countries with similar incomes can have very different life expectancy and school attendance.
What helps: Ask your child to pick a second and third indicator and see whether the ranking of countries changes. That is exactly why composite measures exist.
Treating a national average as true for everyone
A single number feels definite, so students write “people in Country B earn $2,100” as if it applied to each person.
What helps: Teach the phrase “on average”. Ask: who might be above this figure, and who well below it? The teacher will usually reward an answer that mentions inequality within a country.
Explaining poverty with one cause, often blaming the people or the climate
Geography answers that name one reason sound tidy, and “it’s hot there” is an easy one.
What helps: Encourage a mix: a physical cause, a historical one, an economic one and a political one. Real examples such as trade in raw materials or conflict show why no single factor explains everything.
Believing aid always works
Aid is presented positively, and the successes are memorable: emergency food, vaccinations, new wells.
What helps: Ask who benefits, how long it lasts and whether it builds local skills. Emergency aid and long-term projects do different jobs, and some work better when run by local people.
How to help at home
- Compare two countries over supper. Pick two countries from a news story and compare their life expectancy, income and school attendance from any reliable reference source. Ask your teenager which gap surprised them, and what the numbers might hide.
- Read the label. Look at where the clothes, food and electronics in the house were made. Talk about what each country gains from making them and what it might lose, which links trade, work and development.
- Question every average. When a headline gives an average, whether of wages, house prices or test scores, ask what it leaves out. Doing this regularly builds the habit that data questions in geography reward.
- Judge a charity appeal. If a charity leaflet arrives, discuss together what the money does, how the help lasts and who decides. Students find it easy to say “aid is good” but harder to explain how, and a real example makes the evaluation sharper.
- Practise the calculations. Ask for a quick “how many times bigger?” using two numbers from a chart. Dividing to compare is a skill used in geography and maths, and it makes the gap feel real.
Related topics
Builds on
- Key Stage 2: Climate zones, biomes and vegetation belts
- Key Stage 2: Rivers and the water cycle
- Key Stage 2: Mountains
- Key Stage 2: Volcanoes and earthquakes
- Key Stage 2: Settlements and land use
- Key Stage 2: Economic activity and trade
- Key Stage 2: Natural resources
More on human geography
- Key Stage 3: The four sectors of economic activity
- Key Stage 3: Population
- Key Stage 3: Urbanisation and the growth of cities
- Key Stage 3: The use of natural resources
Updated .